2020 Toyota Alphard Singapore Review

2020 Toyota Alphard Singapore Review

Posted on

2020 Toyota Alphard Singapore Review – When it comes to the business of ferrying people, the only vehicle that truly excels in this field is the multi-purpose vehicle (MPV). A sports utility vehicle (SUV) may be able to perform the same task, but even the most MPV-averse, sports car-loving enthusiast will eventually admit (only after being severely tortured) that an MPV remains the best car for this job.

2020 Toyota Alphard Singapore Review

The reason for this is simple – an MPV’s sole purpose is to move people, whereas SUVs are primarily built to go off-roading. Even if an SUV was large enough to accommodate seven passengers, it still wouldn’t be as comfortable as an MPV.

The two MPVs we have assembled here are both capable of transporting up to seven people, but that’s where their similarities end. For starters, the Indonesian-built Avanza is Toyota’s entry-level MPV, while the Japanese-made Alphard is the brand’s top-end people-carrier. Back in 2014, their price difference was a cool $108,000 – almost enough to purchase a brand new Vios then.

The price gap is reflected in the different sizes of these MPVs. At 4140mm long and 1660mm wide, the dimensions of the unassuming Avanza are similar to that of a compact saloon. The Alphard’s massive physical presence, on the other hand, is difficult to ignore. Measuring 4870mm long, 1830mm wide, and towering at 1905mm (the Avanza is only 1695mm high), it’s obvious that the box-like Alphard offers more space, too.2020 Toyota Alphard Singapore Review

Hop into the Avanza and it’s no surprise that its cockpit is as plain as its exterior. Toyota is honest about the “entry-level” bit, for the driver only has very basic equipment. The seats, for instance, are upholstered in vinyl, while the air-con controls consist of a pair of large rotary dials. The sunvisors do not even have vanity mirrors and the steering wheel is only adjustable for rake. And although it is factory-fitted, the hi-fi unit looks so dated that you’d think it came from a Toyota model made in 1990.

Climb aboard the Alphard and you’re immediately surrounded by elegance. In contrast to the Avanza, the Alphard’s seats (which have armrests as standard) are covered in leather and electrically adjustable. The dashboard and steering wheel have faux wood trimmings that towkays love, and the plastic surfaces are soft instead of hard. The air-conditioning is also twice as effective as the Avanza’s and comes with three climate zones as an added benefit.

Second-row passengers in the Alphard, who are likely to be captains of industry, will feel pampered once they settle into the excellent captain’s chairs. If said occupants are feeling sleepy after a big executive lunch, they can catch a quick nap on the way back to the office by reclining the seats to extend their footrests.

People in the Avanza’s second row, however, will only be welcomed by a pair of conventional seats that form a long bench. Like the Alphard, there is an additional set of air-con controls, but it is an analogue system as opposed to the Alphard’s fancier digital panel. The rear air-con vents are mounted above the passengers’ heads, which limits their effectiveness. In the Alphard, they are strategically located throughout the cabin to further increase the system’s cooling efficiency.

Also just as efficient is the access to the Alphard’s third-row seats. Thanks to the gap between those captain’s chairs and the high ceiling, passengers can simply walk to the rear. It’s a different story in the Avanza, whose second-row bench must be tumbled forward to create an opening for occupants to squeeze past.2020 Toyota Alphard Singapore Review

Because the Avanza’s 2655mm wheelbase is 295mm shorter than the Alphard’s, the available legroom in the last row is a lot more limited – even if you were to slide the second-row seats forward. Meanwhile, occupants in the Alphard’s third row need not feel short-changed, because the space back there is more than adequate, even for adults.

Despite being equipped with only a 1.5-litre inline-4 that produces 103bhp and 136Nm, the Avanza delivers a surprisingly perky drive. Tuned for city driving, there’s little hesitation when moving off from a standstill, but once you reach moderate to expressway speeds, the motor’s lack of mid-range grunt becomes obvious. Interestingly, the engine sounds workmanlike only at low speeds – it’s fairly quiet when you’re cruising at 80km/h.

If it’s a quiet ride you want, then it’s the Alphard you need. Its 2.4-litre inline-4 is refined and the continuously variable transmission (CVT) it’s paired to is so creamy, you would think it was a torque converter. On paper, the 170bhp and 224Nm this powerplant churns out seem decent, but given that the Alphard weighs 1.9 tonnes (200kg heavier than the Avanza), its performance feels more relaxed than its smaller sibling’s.

Choosing between either of these MPVs is like booking tickets for your entire family on a full-service airline. Both MPVs can get you to your destination, and the only question is how comfortable you want the journey to be.